How Octane Thinks Like an Attacker

Our offensive AI uncovered four critical bugs in Suzaku’s code, before it ever hit mainnet.

Hey, it’s Gio.

We’ve had a lot of folks join the list over the past few weeks. Glad you’re here.

To help us keep these updates useful, I’d love to know:

How are you handling security before launch?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

This week’s story

Most tools wait for bugs to appear.
Octane looks for them the same way a real attacker would.

That mindset is what helped Suzaku catch four vulnerabilities before launch.
And it’s why more teams are treating offensive security as essential, not just a nice-to-have.

Case Study: Suzaku's validator logic under attack

Suzaku is building a low-latency finality layer for Avalanche subnets, securing multichain deployments with a coordinated validator set.

Since launch, Suzaku has steadily attracted adoption, with around eight million dollars in value secured.

That growth means more responsibility and more incentive for attackers to look for cracks.

When Suzaku ran their code through Octane, our AI models simulated how an attacker might probe validator coordination.

Here’s what we found:

  • Middleware Reassignment: a missing authorization validation in setL1Middleware() let any address reroute validator flow to untrusted middleware—compromising consensus and validator coordination.

  • Validator Registrations: registerL1() lacked permission controls, allowing unauthorized actors to register fake validator managers and poison the validator registry.

  • Slashing Attack: any address could invoke slashVault() to penalize every vault at once, draining staked funds and paralyzing the protocol with a single transaction.

  • Asset Class Creation: addAssetClass() had no ownership restriction, letting anyone add asset classes with fake parameters that disrupted staking and rewards.

These weren’t theoretical edge cases, they were exploitable issues that could have led to stuck chains, drained funds, and serious loss of protocol integrity.

Octane identified all four within minutes.

What makes Octane different?

Most tools analyze code like a checklist.
Octane simulates behavior like an adversary.

Our models are trained on real-world exploit data. We simulate attacker behavior by probing for state manipulation, unintended logic paths, and missing protections across contracts. We teach our models what to look for like incorrect state updates, orphaned access controls, or exploitable storage collisions and then run those patterns at scale.

Octane doesn’t just surface a bug.
It explains what makes it dangerous, simulates how it might be exploited, and recommends fix logic, often in the form of a drop-in patch.
Teams get both context and code they can act on.

Instead of scanning for known patterns, Octane models how real exploits unfold across contracts and systems.

It’s designed to catch logic flaws, missing permissions, and coordination risks that other tools often miss.

And unlike manual audits, which happen once (and are bound by time and reviewer fatigue), Octane runs continuously. Every pull request. Every update. Every time your code changes.

This shift is already underway

We’re seeing a mindset shift across the space.

Teams used to treat audits as the final word. But as more protocols get burned, even after passing audits, they’re realizing: it’s not enough to play defense.

You need tools that simulate what an attacker would actually do.
You need security that evolves with your code.
And you need it embedded in your development flow…not bolted on at the end.

The best teams aren’t replacing audits. Instead they’re layering continuous, adversarial checks on top of them.

It’s how they move fast without compromising security.

Why this matters

If you’re building with validators, cross-chain logic, or smart contracts that touch real assets then the kind of bugs Suzaku caught aren’t rare. 

These aren’t “nice-to-catch” bugs…they’re the kind that can break your system. And the earlier you find them, the safer (and faster) your launch will be.

And because every finding is scored using a severity matrix based on likelihood and impact, you can confidently prioritize what matters most.

Want to see how this played out in detail?

More soon,
Gio

Ready to Secure Your Smart Contracts?

Deploy with confidence by adding Octane’s AI security to your CI/CD pipeline. Schedule a live demo to see how we deliver 24/7 offensive intelligence and real-time vulnerability detection.

Interested in hearing more?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.